Paul announced on February 3 that the initiative might be accepted by warring Sudanese parties, aiming to advance a humanitarian ceasefire path toward a broader settlement. Reports indicate that the Rapid Support Forces commander responded with official remarks, showing no willingness to make concessions or accept any settlement format. A spokesperson for the US State Department stated that Washington is aware of the proposal presented by General Burhan, emphasizing that the comprehensive plan developed by the Quad countries in consultation with all parties represents the best path forward.
Paul faces pressure to make tangible progress on the Sudan file to bolster the record of the peace council supporting US President Donald Trump. Any new failure could weaken his position, as previous efforts have not yielded decisive results. The US State Department confirmed that resolving the Sudanese crisis is a “deep personal commitment” for President Trump, with ongoing efforts supervised and monitored by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
The report also highlighted that the “Peace Council,” introduced in the context of post-Gaza war arrangements, raises questions about its potential role in the Sudan file. There are doubts regarding its intent to compete with UN institutions, particularly the UN Security Council. Paul stated that the peace plan, after approval by the Quad countries, will be presented first to the Security Council and then to the Peace Council. The US spokesperson stressed that the Council complements rather than replaces other international efforts.
However, days after Paul expressed optimism about progress in ceasefire efforts, negotiations appear stalled due to the rigidity of both parties regarding their red lines. The Rapid Support Forces, led by Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, insist on removing Islamists and figures linked to ousted President Omar al-Bashir from the army, security agencies, and military institutions. In contrast, the Sudanese army demands the dissolution of the Rapid Support Forces, viewing them as an illegal armed group that contradicts state authority. Diplomats believe that any humanitarian ceasefire, even if achieved, will remain fragile until the dispute over transitional arrangements and security structures is resolved.
